if they had made a unified copilot agent they would have won. Think open claw with the power of NPUs for small tasks and cloud for big queries dedicated APIs for interacting with all the microsoft products special tailored version for developers. More focus on retrieving information and doing small tasks for the user than generating slop.

The first versions they released were so fucking bad and every app had basically just a chatbot with zero functionality. It ruined the product for when it could actually do tasks.

I dont know what you mean by “how do we split the hair on that camel” so I just assumed you were complaining about stocks.

Whats your complaint? Stocks are a way to make ownership available to workers.

Actually yeah it does. If your stock pays dividend you are getting a share of the workers labour.

AI Sloppaganda

time for a new shell or enable ‘set completion-ignore-case on’ in bashrc

Removed by mod

By the end I was convinced. From now on I will be giving my burgers a “living tilt”

If you’re a user that requires age verification (IE a child) then you cant just add it. Your parent will be the root user controlling your account.

How does that verify nothing? It provides perfectly fine age verification.

No it doesnt. If I ask are you 18 and you reply no/yes that is verifying your age without doxing you. This field is for when the user is NOT admin on the machine. This field would be filled out by the parent when they’re setting up their kids machine.

How is it not suitable? If I setup my kids age and an app wants to use the portal to check if he is over 18 and it returns no. That suitable age verification and its privacy respecting. Which is what is being suggested.

Whats wrong with Age verification? its fine to verify age, the problem with the age verification laws is the issue of how age is being verified. In this case its fine because its local first and privacy respecting.