Is it weird that when a shitpost that is supposed to polarize people reaches main page, people get triggered?
Because honestly this is baiting.
Is it weird that when a shitpost that is supposed to polarize people reaches main page, people get triggered?
Because honestly this is baiting.
Obviously the attack helicopter, duh.


Read the thread, it’s mentioned and explained further in.


separatist movement
seek asylum
nearby liberal democracy
Russia
I, uh, do not believe we have the same definitions for those words.


Removed by mod


I do wish lemmy would add a “user country of origin” feature.


Removed by mod


You are asking the wrong person that question. I wrote “that did it”, GiorgioPerlasca linked the name of the org. Why are you asking him what I meant? Please be more attentive.


User added context: this happened during a separatist march that wanted the Odessa to leave Ukraine and join Russia & the far right organisation that did it, tried to become a political party and got 0.7% of votes.
I didn’t know him so I cant tell if he was a socialist, but the group he was part of was not trying to have a socialist revolution in Ukraine, but rejoin Russia (who is not socialist, so honestly no idea what you are talking about).
As a software engineer I have to defend gender binary in the ui:
Gender? True | false
:D
I don’t think Japan is know for incentivising self expression or treating the individualism as a virtue?

I will look at the US for an example By species, we estimate that 70.4% of cows
Cool. As the authors of the study I linked wrote, with sources, global stat is <13%.
Example: dairy, 1 liter of milk requires - depending on the method and location -between 19L of freshwater (section 5.2) to almost 3000L, median 196. In USA it starts at ~700L.
99.8% of turkeys, 98.2% of chickens raised for eggs, and over 99.9% of chickens raised for meat are
Interestingly average poultry requires less land than average pulses. And there’s this gem from section 5.2 (again, the linked document has further sources) further explaining why LCA or applying US averages globally is wrong.
As another example, that the lowest 10 percentile footprint dairy farms have lower greenhouse gas equivalent emissions than the 90th percentile soy, nut, and oat farm
Using 100% of the land, which would create huge deforestation pressures
Same study, point 4.1.
which I significantly doubt given the history of those kinds of methods over promising and under delivering
5.1 and 5.3 why Beyond Meat and similar are over promising and under delivering, with already established examples that show that the substitutes did not decrease meat/dairy consumptions but added to the total consumption.
EDIT: It’s also worth noting that a lot of people that start on things like beyond and impossible end up eventually switching to much more whole plant-based foods in the end anyways.
Citation needed.
I think this is my last post in the thread (and I guess yours too, we seem to exhaust the topic between us).
To sum it up:
we agree on whole plant based diet being the goal
we disagree on the interim diet and how to encourage and enable the transition from current meat-based diets

No.
She bases that information on LCA. LCAs are bullshit:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724002511
Tldr; they are self reported, aggregate data globally and treats the whole globe uniformly, instead of looking at local qualities; and Beyond Meat conviviently for them does not provide even that data for it’s whole supply chain. That means for example that the total carbon footprint of beef of worst industrial farms is applied across all beef produce, even though industrial farms deliver only about 13% of beef worldwide.
Generally I recommend the linked article, they explain why Beyond Meat and similar are just wasting your time at best, or sinister capitalist trick at worst.
Again, the way forward is:
Whole food plant-based diets
and interim is switching feedlot farming and similar to
Furthermore, framing animals as unilaterally less efficient than plants assumes that neither animal production systems nor meat consumption habits can be pushed in more sustainable directions. However, abundant options to make animal-sourced foods more sustainable could be explored, including agro-pastoral, agro-silvo-pastoral (mixed crop-livestock-forest), and regenerative agriculture systems (Costa et al., 2018).

meat and dairy subsidies
That has been proven to be incorrect: https://hannahritchie.substack.com/p/meat-subsidies
Removing the subsidies would rise the prices by cents.
Raw food - any food - is dirt cheap. Most of the costs is the chain of logistics (and that every middleman takes their cut).

just bc of subsidies to dairy and meat
That has been proven to be incorrect: https://hannahritchie.substack.com/p/meat-subsidies
Removing the subsidies would rise the prices by cents.
Raw food - any food - is dirt cheap. Most of the costs is the chain of logistics (and that every middleman takes their cut).

Yeah, no, I refuse to eat anything that has “versions” and my diet is limiting consumption of anything that needs a formula to make. Those are not indicators of food fit for human consumption.
(Before someone calls me names, I’m on plant-based)

I don’t know about your country, but here in Poland “meat subsidies” are targeted at improving animal welfare or insurance (e.g. from avian flu for poultry). I fail to see how it is a problem?

I mean beyond meat production process is famously industrial and complex; there’s even South Park episode on it where Cartman agrees to eat it because it’s the same unhealthy factory made slop that he’s used to.
Now, for the beyond meat oil use. They apparently dropped refined coconut and canola oil in favour of avocado oil. And oh boy, avocado oil production is almost as bad as if Nestle owned all of it, but at least it should be healthier than coconut/canola mix, right? And then most avocado oil is fraudulent soybean/sunflower/other mixes.
And then there’s also avocado oil deforestation/water use etc.
My points are:
Beyond Meat is slop; let’s not switch processed cold cuts for a sludge.
you’re better off (health-wise and climate wise) making different bean patties (chop 'em, freeze 'em, shape 'em, cook 'em) and lowering your red meat intake than switching to beyond meat.

deleted by creator
The question you gotta ask yourself is “why the fuck would you replace one imperialist scum with another imperialist scum”?
https://spectrejournal.com/one-should-not-camouflage-capitalist-and-imperialist-china-as-socialist/