I said capitalism is the economic system of a state. You started going on about international trade, making it sound like “nations compete therefore capitalism is all trade”.
I tried to help you understand by proposing the question of whether a communist state can trade with a capitalist state (it can). So that you understand that capitalism is not defined by international trade.
Don’t try to gocha me with your leading questions, “man”!
said capitalism is the economic system of a state. You started going on about international trade, making it sound like “nations compete therefore capitalism is all trade”.
Your conclusion is false. It’s actually: Capitalism requires nations to compete.
I tried to help you understand by proposing the question of whether a communist state can trade with a capitalist state
If a “communist” state (which is an oxymoron, since communism is by definition stateless) trades with a capitalist state, it’s in a capitalist context. The states interact on a capitalist world market.
So that you understand that capitalism is not defined by international trade.
International trade is a consequence of capitalism in a world of nation states.
Lol come on man.
I said capitalism is the economic system of a state. You started going on about international trade, making it sound like “nations compete therefore capitalism is all trade”.
I tried to help you understand by proposing the question of whether a communist state can trade with a capitalist state (it can). So that you understand that capitalism is not defined by international trade.
I think you forgot what you were arguing about?
Don’t try to gocha me with your leading questions, “man”!
Your conclusion is false. It’s actually: Capitalism requires nations to compete.
If a “communist” state (which is an oxymoron, since communism is by definition stateless) trades with a capitalist state, it’s in a capitalist context. The states interact on a capitalist world market.
International trade is a consequence of capitalism in a world of nation states.