• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    They’re both exploitative, but just imagine like you had to kiss you’re boss on the mouth the unlock your full bonus.

    • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      The more you give the more you might get. True for many many jobs. But this is not forcing, this is not “have to”. This is setting you own boundaries. Like you do with every relationship, private, business, erotic (for lack of a better word) or not.

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        So you think that workplace sexual harassment (exchanging bonuses or promotions or other benefits for sexual activities) is fine, as long as the coercion is only monetary?

          • balsoft@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            I have re-read the comment thread like three times and I don’t see any other interpretation.

            “just imagine like you had to kiss you’re boss on the mouth the unlock your full bonus” (textbook workspace sexual harassment)

            Response:

            • The more you give the more you might get
            • True for many many jobs
            • this is not forcing, this is not “have to”

            How is this anything but defending sexual harassment?

            • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              I read the ‘kiss boss on mouth’ in the context of prostitution, where this might be agreed upon. Thought you asked me to take their perspective.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        I don’t understand your implication. You’ll have to spell it out for me please :)

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            Like what do you mean? That work is like a relationship? I don’t get the comparison. Work is a totally different type of relationship because of the exchange of money. It makes it so you can’t walk away from situations at work that you would in real life

            • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 days ago

              Ah. I meant ‘relationship’ in the broader sense. Like the relation you have with any entity you interact with.

              • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                Yeah I kind of started to figure that’s what you probably meant as I was writing my comment.

                I think we have pretty different views on stuff because I consider these necessarily way different relationships.