Representatives of more than 50 nations gathered in Santa Marta, Colombia, this week at what was billed as the first global summit on phasing out fossil fuels. A panel of scientists will be advising them

Archived copies of the article:

    • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      25 days ago

      How are you going to move large passanger planes to renewable power? Or trucks? Get failed Tesla Semi from Elon Musk?

        • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          25 days ago

          Using Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis

          That’s completely infeasible financially. What you liked is a propaganda piece.

          Even if you used ammonia as fuel, the round trip efficiency is like 17%, steam reforming into regular jet fuel is probably even worse since production has three steps instead of two.

          And If you consider cost of electricity alone this turns into a pipe dream

          • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            25 days ago

            Even if you used ammonia as fuel, the round trip efficiency is like 17%

            Do you have any sources backing this up?

            And also, I mentioned eSAF, not SAF. There’s a difference.

            • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              25 days ago

              Don’t have an article at hand. I’ve seen this in two places, one article back when I was looking into it, and the other was one of Sabine Hossenfelder videos about fuels.

              Numbers in both sources were similar

              • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                25 days ago

                I think the effiency of eSAF is closer to be around 35-50 %, but I am by no means an expert in PtX (PtL).

                But it is still extremely expensive, 6x more expensive than normal jet fuel. And the goal in EU is that by 2030 0.7 % of the fuel mix is eSAF.

                I think the biggest challenge is the infrastructure. We are having issues with negative power prices in EU, more eSAF production can be one solution to a more stable grid in places with a high penetration of renewable energy production.