cm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 24 days agoMathinfosec.pubimagemessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1212arrow-down17
arrow-up1205arrow-down1imageMathinfosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 24 days agomessage-square19linkfedilink
minus-squareEggZackLee@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·24 days agoI would imagine it’s when there’s a conversation happening that’s relevant to the question. In this case, the conversation is explicitly about what causes rape, so the question seems out of place and not in good faith.
minus-squareminorkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·24 days agoSo ‘what causes rape’ is the wrong place to ask ‘where rape occurs’? Got it. Not close enough to be relevant.
minus-squareEggZackLee@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·24 days agoCorrect. Locations are not causal. There is no causal link between rape and location.
I would imagine it’s when there’s a conversation happening that’s relevant to the question. In this case, the conversation is explicitly about what causes rape, so the question seems out of place and not in good faith.
So ‘what causes rape’ is the wrong place to ask ‘where rape occurs’? Got it. Not close enough to be relevant.
Correct.
Locations are not causal. There is no causal link between rape and location.