• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If you relax the “age of exploration” criterion, you can probably add Iceland; it was reportedly uninhabited before Norse settlement around the 9th century.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      If you relax that “age of exploration” and “European” criterion, you can add back in the entire world. (I’m just being silly, not a serious reply to your comment, which I found interesting and topical)

  • naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Betting a lot of those islands in the pacific were already discovered by pacific islanders, and and they just decided they didn’t want to use them…

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Theres evidence of people from the Asian Pacific landing in South America, so I dont know why anyone would think they couldnt have found plenty of tiny islands in the pacific and then left

  • robert@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Dumb question, but what do those candy-cane-like-patterns represent on Greenland and Antarctica? Does that mean multiple European countries discovered them? If so isn’t that inaccurate (Greenland was already inhabited prior to Europeans)?

    • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah the Greenland one is out of place here. It looks like the coast of Greenland isn’t colored, acknowledging prior human presence. But the interior is colored? I’m sure the people there knew there was land over where they could look and see more land. Just because it was inhospitable doesn’t mean it was unknown.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      So the natives were not humans?

      Certain Europeans certainly didn’t think so, but I’m glad the subthread clarified your issue with the map so I can just drop in and be silly at you. :)

      • straussbelial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻…

        Oh, I see. I saw the mark on Brasil and thought it was on the continent

        … ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)