VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 20 days agoInterviews these daysdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square111linkfedilinkarrow-up1797arrow-down17
arrow-up1790arrow-down1imageInterviews these daysdiscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 20 days agomessage-square111linkfedilink
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@feddit.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·19 days agoYour lack of understanding of movement as a combination of vectors makes me think you’re talking out your ass. This is linear algebra. The solution can be written as a matrix of 4th dimensional space. Its all vectors.
minus-squareSlashme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·18 days agoAnd despite your confidence, your answer is wrong. You’re talking about a 3-cube embedded in 4-space instead of a 4-cube, which is why you only see 6 faces, whereas a 4-cube (a tesseract) has 24 faces.
minus-squareFiniteBanjo@feddit.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·18 days agoReal life cubes are 4 dimensional. The 4th dimension is time. How you define the 4th dimension changes the question and I leveraged that to get an easy solution.
Your lack of understanding of movement as a combination of vectors makes me think you’re talking out your ass.
This is linear algebra. The solution can be written as a matrix of 4th dimensional space. Its all vectors.
And despite your confidence, your answer is wrong. You’re talking about a 3-cube embedded in 4-space instead of a 4-cube, which is why you only see 6 faces, whereas a 4-cube (a tesseract) has 24 faces.
Real life cubes are 4 dimensional.
The 4th dimension is time.
How you define the 4th dimension changes the question and I leveraged that to get an easy solution.