This discussion has a defined scope; reasonableness of fediverse moderation. The comment you responded to makes the argument that it really does look like someone was calling for site operators to be killed, and so by longstanding convention and common sense the mod action was reasonable.

Then you respond with the objection that actually they do need to die, although you admit you are not prepared to yourself implement this system of getting web forums to enforce the right political opinions via murdering. Consider: the decisions people make about whether they approve of any given instance are influenced more by who they think sounds like a dipshit than by fear that internet tough guys may come to their house and kill them, those choices are somewhat up in the air, and have actual influence over how things are organized.