I didn’t think you were saying that, as I said in the next sentence. I’m confused because everything you’ve said is just a way of addressing what I was saying, so being so adamantly opposed is just bizarre.

I never dismissed any realities. I think the notion that “lobbying is corruption and should be illegal” is silly because it’s advocating to remove the ideal that should be increased instead of focusing on the corruption.
I disagree that “uncommon” or “difficult” is the same as “not legal”, “pay walled” or “impossible”. I disagree that protesting is the same as lobbying, and that arresting a protester is the same as evidence that lobbying is illegal.
Not the same as dismissing the problems with any of them.