• PugJesus@piefed.socialM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 days ago

    The resulting nuclear war would likely be limited between Israel and whoever the other nuclear party was, meaning probably ~100 million deaths would be the upper limit.

    In any case, the indiscriminate death of millions of civilians would be a fucking horrific thing.

    • okwhateverdude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Even a small scale nuclear war would do horrible shit to the planet climate wise not to mention the economic fallout. We’re already seeing the knock-on effects of the Hormuz shit. Now imagine those producer countries nuked to shit and instead of a temporary problem it becomes a permanent problem.

    • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, like if we just indiscriminately bombed an entire country, then prevented anyone from sending aide while simultaneously bombing their hospitals. That would be bad. Then if we used snipers to kill their children, imprisoned the rest, then raped and abused them in detention, that would be pretty bad huh? In fact, you could say a society that condones such actions deserves to be destroyed…