• BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Hypersonic and hyper agile don’t really go together. The laws of physics, particularly inertia and friction, will quickly put an end to that fantasy.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      A 10G turn is a 10G turn, at any speed. The arc looks real wide on a plot, but that doesn’t mean its unmanuverable and easy-to-intercept

      That being said, I think OP’s got it wrong. The ballistic starting point is more important than manuverability here.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Back to back “international warfare laws are merely suggestions” posts today, I see.

    Honestly, Russia got plastered all over the news for trying to put rocket propelles missiles in space multiple times in my life, if another nation tried it then they could expect the same or higher level of sanctions and loss of trust.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Besides it being a war crime, that must be committed before any war or there’s no point (thus giving plenty of time for everybody to justifiably shoot you first):

    • orbits are extremely predictable and easy to spot, thus easy to attack;

    • getting things in orbit is very expensive, for what serves the same purpose of a submarine;

    • orbits are extremely spread, so you will need a ridiculous number of missiles with a ridiculously low availability.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      getting things in orbit is very expensive, for what serves the same purpose of a submarine

      Orbital scanning tech is getting more advanced by the year. Submarines may lose their stealth advantage by the end of the decade

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        We are comparing them to something that you can detect by looking up. They will never lose that advantage.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It doesn’t fucking matter if the satellites are easier to detect. The job of a sub isn’t to kill satellites. It’s job is to stay hidden and be ready to nuke a country in a retaliatory strike as a deterrent.

          Subs are slow, and very high value targets if you’re looking at a potential nuclear exchange. If a sub is spotted, it’s going to be added to the list of first strike targets so the attacker doesn’t have to worry about retaliation.

          • marcos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            So, putting the missiles in orbit instead of the submarine improves exactly what on that list of requirements?

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              The missiles will be significantly harder to hit than the submarine in a few years.

              Are there missile defense systems? Yes, but taking down short range missiles is significantly easier than ICBMs or hypersonic missiles. It’s like hitting a bullet with another bullet if you don’t catch it early in the launch.

              And you’re forgetting that MIRV’s are a thing. Missile defense systems have limited capacity and are expensive to field. Meanwhile you can use MIRV’s to multiply the effective number of missiles you’re launching for not much extra cost.

              • marcos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                The missiles will be significantly harder to hit than the submarine in a few years.

                The missiles that pass over your head in a fixed time 16 times a day?

                • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Way to completely misread what I said.

                  The missiles won’t be harder to hit in the future. Submarines are going to be that much easier to hit.

                  Are you done being a dick now?