all_i_see@lemy.lol to World News@quokk.au · 14 days agoIran has not agreed to hand over highly enriched uranium stockpile, senior Iranian source tells Reuterswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up179arrow-down10
arrow-up179arrow-down1external-linkIran has not agreed to hand over highly enriched uranium stockpile, senior Iranian source tells Reuterswww.reuters.comall_i_see@lemy.lol to World News@quokk.au · 14 days agomessage-square8linkfedilink
minus-squareceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-214 days agoBecause it’s never been a thing; they’ve never had or worked towards nukes.
minus-squarefrongt@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up5·14 days agoNo they definitely have, but not earnestly. They’ve developed nuclear capability for energy, but there’s a lot of overlap between that and weapons, so they’ve kept the potential for weapons in their back pocket.
minus-squareTheJesusaurus@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 days agoSo what though, let’s say they did. So fucking what. They aren’t allowed? Says who, we all have them.
minus-squaremrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·14 days agoAmerican intelligence said Iran stopped seeking nukes in 2003.
Because it’s never been a thing; they’ve never had or worked towards nukes.
No they definitely have, but not earnestly. They’ve developed nuclear capability for energy, but there’s a lot of overlap between that and weapons, so they’ve kept the potential for weapons in their back pocket.
So what though, let’s say they did. So fucking what. They aren’t allowed? Says who, we all have them.
American intelligence said Iran stopped seeking nukes in 2003.