Yes, the wiki had a quote from an art museum that I suppose had showed the photo, saying “The spectacle of consumerism appears composed in an organized, rigorous, formal fashion. The presented image is hyperreal. While it is rooted in reality, it is somehow more than real; it is familiar and yet there is no physical space quite like it. By portraying such heightened constructions of our shared existence — from the dollar store to the soccer field to the sprawling cityscape — Gursky’s photographs act as symbols of contemporary life.”
I don’t know if the colors are enhanced in any way, which would then make it hyperreal. They seem to be what you’d see normally, just all at once.
They seem to be what you’d see normally, just all at once.
I mean it’s just one person’s opinion but it makes sense to me. By letting you take in the whole scene at once without any dimensionality you see a department store in way that is, while real, not something you could see with the naked eye. Hyper like a hypercube?
But I see your perspective too ofc, that if no part of the image visually boosted then you could say you’ve seen something like it, ever if you haven’t seen something the entire thing.
Thanks for snipping the quote! I do have a weakness for this kind of artsy fartsy stuff
Is this a reference to the article I linked? Sorry I didn’t reread the whole thing, so not sure what you’re commenting on
Yes, the wiki had a quote from an art museum that I suppose had showed the photo, saying “The spectacle of consumerism appears composed in an organized, rigorous, formal fashion. The presented image is hyperreal. While it is rooted in reality, it is somehow more than real; it is familiar and yet there is no physical space quite like it. By portraying such heightened constructions of our shared existence — from the dollar store to the soccer field to the sprawling cityscape — Gursky’s photographs act as symbols of contemporary life.”
I don’t know if the colors are enhanced in any way, which would then make it hyperreal. They seem to be what you’d see normally, just all at once.
I mean it’s just one person’s opinion but it makes sense to me. By letting you take in the whole scene at once without any dimensionality you see a department store in way that is, while real, not something you could see with the naked eye. Hyper like a hypercube?
But I see your perspective too ofc, that if no part of the image visually boosted then you could say you’ve seen something like it, ever if you haven’t seen something the entire thing.
Thanks for snipping the quote! I do have a weakness for this kind of artsy fartsy stuff