It might be news to you, but this here is a collaborative effort. If you want to be helpful, contribute yourself. The humble or polite part is for the birds.
Nah, I’m actually happy in this community. The length isn’t the issue, it’s the clickbait bullshit you’re pulling here. Several other articles here have been appropriately titled and I’ve been given summaries which helped me decide if the original was worth reading or not.
I’m afraid you have to actually read it. I know, a lost art in this day and age.
Bro never heard of blurbs on books
I’m not your bro, pal. You’re reading a collaborative annotatable aggregator. You need a blurb, you write one yourself.
Bro got mad they argument was pointed out to be chronologically incorrect so had to use big words
Ew. That’s not helpful or humble, OP. 🤢
It might be news to you, but this here is a collaborative effort. If you want to be helpful, contribute yourself. The humble or polite part is for the birds.
Yeah, I can totally see the collab shining through your downvotes here, clear as a bell.
How’s the air up there on your horse? Rarified? Thin and heady? Yep. Seems like. 🤌🏼
If it can’t be summarized then nah, I’m not reading clickbait.
You won’t be happy in this community, then. There are a lot of long articles posted here, unapologetically.
Nah, I’m actually happy in this community. The length isn’t the issue, it’s the clickbait bullshit you’re pulling here. Several other articles here have been appropriately titled and I’ve been given summaries which helped me decide if the original was worth reading or not.
Never mind the bollocks. ✊🏼
False.