• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    13 days ago

    Explanation: In WW2, the decision-makers of Nazi Germany increasingly prioritized ‘impressive’ and increasingly heavy tanks over the more mobile designs of the Interwar period and early WW2.

    Surely THIS ridiculous wunderwaffe will bring the Thousand-Year Reich victory! Do you not believe in the endsieg, TRAITOR?!

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      Is there some hilarious reverse size joke in German, where the “smaller” tanks are Panther and Tiger, and the huge one is Mouse?

      • naeap@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        At least I always understood it that way

        Not sure, if this is a German thing, but also here in Austria we call the heavy machines often with cute names for little things.
        Thought, that’s not a regional thing though

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      A comparison with modern and lost war tanks might be useful as tanks did grow in a useful way, too. But they are much smaller still.

      The Leo 2 is similar to the tiger 2 in size and weight, being somewhat heavier, even.