The radical anti-capitalist group took up arms against what they saw as US imperialism and a “fascist” German state still riddled with former Nazis. It is believed to have been responsible for killing at least 30 people and injuring 200.
Both I’d say, though mainly the latter.
Also it gets really muddled when you look closer. There were three different “generations” of RAF members, that didn’t have that much to do with each other, personally or ideologically. And of course there was also involvement of secret services, which still hasn’t really been researched deeply.
She was charged for attempted murder and robberies (convicted only for the latter), and the only reason why she was not tried for terrorist offences committed before the early 1990s was because a statute of limitations deadline had expired.
Are these ‘activities’ fine if and when the person who commits them claims to be ‘left-wing’ and ‘anti-capitalist’? Am I a ‘fash’ if I don’t want people to be robbed at gunpoint (and killed) just because they work in a bank or have been in the wrong place at the wrong time?
And, if so, what exactly is the difference if such crimes are committed by a right-winger for some other abnormal ‘reasons’? What difference does it make to the victims?
she was wanted for robberies, not for murder. implying she killed people is a pretty fucking scummy thing to do. you’re straight up lying.
Are these ‘activities’ fine if and when the person who commits them claims to be ‘left-wing’ and ‘anti-capitalist’?
yes. be gay, do crime, kill Nazis and Zionists. the German billionaires are the grandchildren of literal Nazis that escaped punishment because the US and other allies didn’t want to kill rich Nazis. there’s a moral obligation steal the wages of the working class that were pilfered by Nazi billionaires. this woman is a hero and should be celebrated as such.
Are we talking innocent people or fash scum?
Both I’d say, though mainly the latter. Also it gets really muddled when you look closer. There were three different “generations” of RAF members, that didn’t have that much to do with each other, personally or ideologically. And of course there was also involvement of secret services, which still hasn’t really been researched deeply.
She was charged for attempted murder and robberies (convicted only for the latter), and the only reason why she was not tried for terrorist offences committed before the early 1990s was because a statute of limitations deadline had expired.
Are these ‘activities’ fine if and when the person who commits them claims to be ‘left-wing’ and ‘anti-capitalist’? Am I a ‘fash’ if I don’t want people to be robbed at gunpoint (and killed) just because they work in a bank or have been in the wrong place at the wrong time?
And, if so, what exactly is the difference if such crimes are committed by a right-winger for some other abnormal ‘reasons’? What difference does it make to the victims?
she was wanted for robberies, not for murder. implying she killed people is a pretty fucking scummy thing to do. you’re straight up lying.
yes. be gay, do crime, kill Nazis and Zionists. the German billionaires are the grandchildren of literal Nazis that escaped punishment because the US and other allies didn’t want to kill rich Nazis. there’s a moral obligation steal the wages of the working class that were pilfered by Nazi billionaires. this woman is a hero and should be celebrated as such.
@[email protected]
What you are doing is openly calling for violence, apparently out of a degenerated mindset.
it doesn’t matter how much you suck on their boots, those Nazi billionaires are never going to fuck you.
Mainly the latter but there were civilian victims.