Poor ruling family, so unfair that the tsar’s kids that were raised to rule the country with an iron fist were faced with what their family gave to everyone a million times over. So true!
Poor absolute rulers’’ children. So unfair. I remember that when I read about the 1905 rebellion against the Tsar, when unionists were murdered and united in response, and forced the tsar to make concessions, like creating the duma. Then the tsar considered the duma insolent, and had them murdered and or sent to work camps in the country.
Poor tsar, it’s a shame when they face what they visit a millionfold on others. Poor UH ceo for that matter, so unfair!
Poor absolute rulers’’ children. So unfair. I remember that when I read about the 1905 rebellion against the Tsar, when unionists were murdered and united in response, and forced the tsar to make concessions, like creating the duma. Then the tsar considered the duma insolent, and had them murdered and or sent to work camps in the country.
Poor tsar, it’s a shame when they face what they visit a millionfold on others. Poor UH ceo for that matter, so unfair!
… did you miss “The Tsar deserved the execution. So did the Tsarina.”?
Or do you just enjoy murdering children for being born to the wrong people, like supporters of the Palestinian genocide?
Killing feudalism is more important than the kids of the feudal lords. Feudalism was a curse on our lands from the end of the roman empire, to the 20th century in russia.
Yes, as the revolution in france prior, the revolution in Russia was not wrong to kill the royal family. Just as a royal family will kill the kids that have rival claimants.
Killing feudalism is more important than the kids of the feudal lords. Feudalism was a curse on our lands from the end of the roman empire, to the 20th century in russia.
Oh, good thing, then, that the Bolsheviks were killing feudalism, right?
Oh, no? What they actually killed was a democratic socialist government which had already successfully deposed the Tsar and his family without causing a civil war?
Huh.
But sure, tell me more about how the murder of the Romanov children was totally justified, because their father was a criminal.
Yes, as the revolution in france prior, the revolution in Russia was not wrong to kill the royal family.
The French Revolution effectively murdering the ten year old child that was the Dauphin was one of its crimes.
Less relevantly to the issue of children, the same with murdering Citoyen Egalite, whose only crime was supporting the Revolution.
Just as a royal family will kill the kids that have rival claimants.
Such is fairly rare precisely because nobles are hesitant about the notion of sanctioning infinite retributive murder games.
You ever read about ottoman successions?
This may come as a shock to you, but I happen to feel those were terrible crimes as well?
Poor ruling family, so unfair that the tsar’s kids that were raised to rule the country with an iron fist were faced with what their family gave to everyone a million times over. So true!
… yes, it is unfair that children were murdered for no fault of their own but being born to the wrong parents. The fuck is wrong with you?
The Tsar deserved the execution. So did the Tsarina.
But murdering their children was a horrific crime.
Poor absolute rulers’’ children. So unfair. I remember that when I read about the 1905 rebellion against the Tsar, when unionists were murdered and united in response, and forced the tsar to make concessions, like creating the duma. Then the tsar considered the duma insolent, and had them murdered and or sent to work camps in the country.
Poor tsar, it’s a shame when they face what they visit a millionfold on others. Poor UH ceo for that matter, so unfair!
… did you miss “The Tsar deserved the execution. So did the Tsarina.”?
Or do you just enjoy murdering children for being born to the wrong people, like supporters of the Palestinian genocide?
Killing feudalism is more important than the kids of the feudal lords. Feudalism was a curse on our lands from the end of the roman empire, to the 20th century in russia.
Yes, as the revolution in france prior, the revolution in Russia was not wrong to kill the royal family. Just as a royal family will kill the kids that have rival claimants.
You ever read about ottoman successions?
Oh, good thing, then, that the Bolsheviks were killing feudalism, right?
Oh, no? What they actually killed was a democratic socialist government which had already successfully deposed the Tsar and his family without causing a civil war?
Huh.
But sure, tell me more about how the murder of the Romanov children was totally justified, because their father was a criminal.
The French Revolution effectively murdering the ten year old child that was the Dauphin was one of its crimes.
Less relevantly to the issue of children, the same with murdering Citoyen Egalite, whose only crime was supporting the Revolution.
Such is fairly rare precisely because nobles are hesitant about the notion of sanctioning infinite retributive murder games.
This may come as a shock to you, but I happen to feel those were terrible crimes as well?