• AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d expect nothing less from a scientist. Decrying pedantry from a scientist would be like decrying financial accuracy from an accountant.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        When its warranted yes, the pedantry is a plus.

        The gift of a talented pop scientist is to know when to turn on and off the pedantry.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      This seems to be easily said of anyone trying to popularize science philosophy.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      That is sort of how the universe operates though. You can have a greater and greater understanding of the underlying principles of physics but eventually you do get to “that just how it is”. Why is there no such thing as a negative photon, apparently we just can’t have a negative excitation in the photon field, no one knows why.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean one of the points he’s making there comes up in every good science class: science doesn’t answer ‘why’ it answers ‘how’. The goal of science is to describe what we see in the world; science less about explaining things. Its easy to do without being a pedant. He’s absolutely being pedantic on camera in that clip.

        Like if you look at how people treat science now: MAGA completely pissing on it because its funded by snake oil people. Rich guys like Elon Musk cynically using it as a way to bilk the public and government. The press just has different goals than the scientific community and I would say that clip showed some of that friction manifest.