ThinkTank
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Fontasia@feddit.nl to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev · 9 days ago

VPN Protocol Alignment chart

feddit.nl

message-square
17
link
fedilink
96

VPN Protocol Alignment chart

feddit.nl

Fontasia@feddit.nl to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev · 9 days ago
message-square
17
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 days ago

    Psychotic: https://github.com/earthquake/XFLTReaT

    Tunnel your packets over DNS requests.

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I used to do that once upon a time for free internet in airports

      • john_lemmy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        I get blocked often when trying to use Wireguard in similar scenarios, but I don’t know what they are blocking specifically

        • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah, semi-public wifi is a lot more waterproof these days. My IPoDNS days were back in 2009ish

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        What was the performance like? I assume it would be pretty shit

        • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          It was, but it was better than nothing and quite convenient

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Oh I remember that. I think it was called like the 53rd element as a reference to port 53 for DNS.

  • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 days ago

    Having IKEv2 and IPsec as separate items doesn’t make sense. IKEv2 is an authentication protocol, which IPsec can use for key exchange.

    Perhaps instead have “IKEv2/IPsec” and “L2TP/IPsec”. Or even OpenSSH tunnels?

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t think I’ve ever used IKEv2 outside of IPsec.

      I have, however, used ipsec with Ike (fortinet) and l2tp (cisco)

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Which one is Neutral Evil ?

    • discozombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      Cisco AnyConnect

  • Clocks [She/They]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Why is Cisco Anyconnect neutral evil?

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      because Cisco

      • Clocks [She/They]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I am clueless

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          a clue! a clue!

  • refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    SoftEther doesn’t belong in one spot because it emulates several different types of VPN transports simultaneously: PPTP, IPsec, SSTP, OpenVPN, pure TLS etc.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Wireguard lawful good? https://medium.com/@cyberlpz777/wireguard-as-a-stealth-c2-channel-abuse-of-modern-vpns-evasion-and-detection-a4663a2df874

iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev

iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

you know the computer thing is it plugged in?

A community for memes and posts about tech and IT related rage.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 93 users / week
  • 486 users / month
  • 890 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 1.74K subscribers
  • 81 Posts
  • 118 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • irelephant [he/him]@programming.dev
  • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • Shivering@programming.dev
  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
  • King Tootsie@programming.dev
  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org