• Freakazoid! @feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    one could of course try to make an easier or better suited language but calling it a poor tool is harsh critique considering that esperanto is the most sucessful attempt for an artificial global language today and already avoids many hard to learn features from other languages.

    • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      What can I say, the bar isn’t high. It avoids some hard to learn features but introduces others, mostly in the phonetics and orthography.

        • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oh, don’t get me wrong, I still think Esperanto was an amazing attempt at a global communication tool. It just didn’t age that well, in my opinion. And the whole concept of an artificial global language is still something that should be pursued.

    • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Why even make a language, if there are plenty of existing languages to choose from?

      Just pick the most widely understood one and you’re done.

      • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        One problem in international relationships is that native speakers of the language that is used will always be able to express themselves better than others and will thus have an advantage in debates and discussions. The original idea was that everyone should learn Esperanto as a second language which would level the field and improve international relations.