You have to remember and realise, Ars Technica is a tech site. In fact, the name is Latin for “the art of technology” (I think — something like that). If they don’t embrace AI to some extent, how can they reasonably call themselves a tech site? They have to embrace it.
Let’s say there’s a magazine on constructing buildings. Do they have to embrace using asbestos themselves to report on it?
I feel like you’d be happier if you left this comm and joined the one called “Fuck AI”. (I’m on that comm as well. I don’t like it either, and I’m not going to argue for it with you here.)
Let’s say there’s a magazine on constructing buildings. Do they have to embrace using asbestos themselves to report on it?
Asbestos Is inevitable
I feel like you’d be happier if you left this comm and joined the one called “Fuck AI”. (I’m on that comm as well. I don’t like it either, and I’m not going to argue for it with you here.)
I’m happy here, thanks. I try not to go too extreme on echo chambers.