• redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    21 days ago

    The 747’s higher fuel consumption and emissions made it obsolete and decommissioned from passenger flights.

    So pimping one for 1 billion makes sense (/S) …So much for your ‘free’ plane. Qatari must be laughing their asses of. Got rid of the thing for free.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      21 days ago

      That is absolutely true, but in case of military transports, you’ll notice that the vast majority are 4 engine. It has to do with survivability.

      • redlemace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yes and No … For what I’ve read, a 747 is designed to fly on one engine. It can’t take-off on just the one, but flying it will (but yeah, I can see that 4 engines can makes sense for -some- military cases)

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          It’s the same reason why the Airbus 340 was made. Before the extension of ETOPS, many airlines who wanted to fly long routes over water wanted 4 engines, especially asian customers.