I love how everyone on the internet assumes everyone else on the internet is an idiot with no relevant education or work experience on a given topic. I’ll join in the fun.
Brilliant. That you for violating your NDA to add your genuine expert understanding, Dr. Mushroommunk.
This one’s for anyone following along more than you. I won’t be replying again.
Maybe stop proving them right?
Let’s review.
I started with my relevant education and experience. Provided peer reviewed research that hundreds of people were involved in. Provided a rebuttal of the research you linked to (granted not the most well written as I was tired, but a rebuttal).
You made a grand claim (which in the scientific community puts the onus of proof on you). You provided zero relevant education or experience. You provided one non peer reviewed paper by a single student. You provided zero proof that paper even made the claim you were trying to assert for it. You provided zero rebuttal for the paper I provided. You ended with a thought terminating cliche.
I’m also exhausted. I wish I was wrong. Nothing would please me more.
Well congratulations, all the evidence still points at the fact that you are wrong. You’re free.
I love how everyone on the internet assumes everyone else on the internet is an idiot with no relevant education or work experience on a given topic. I’ll join in the fun.
Brilliant. That you for violating your NDA to add your genuine expert understanding, Dr. Mushroommunk.
This one’s for anyone following along more than you. I won’t be replying again.
Maybe stop proving them right?
Let’s review.
I started with my relevant education and experience. Provided peer reviewed research that hundreds of people were involved in. Provided a rebuttal of the research you linked to (granted not the most well written as I was tired, but a rebuttal).
You made a grand claim (which in the scientific community puts the onus of proof on you). You provided zero relevant education or experience. You provided one non peer reviewed paper by a single student. You provided zero proof that paper even made the claim you were trying to assert for it. You provided zero rebuttal for the paper I provided. You ended with a thought terminating cliche.