cm0002@toast.ooo to United States | News & Politics@midwest.social · 2 months agoSupreme Court backs Monsanto in its fight against liability from popular weed killerwww.npr.orgexternal-linkmessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court backs Monsanto in its fight against liability from popular weed killerwww.npr.orgcm0002@toast.ooo to United States | News & Politics@midwest.social · 2 months agomessage-square4linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareChrobin@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoThe supreme Court is corrupt, and Bayer/Monsanto are fucking terrible, but this is the right decision. If a governmental agency confirms glyphosate is not cancerous (in reasonable doses), why would they need to add a warning label?
The supreme Court is corrupt, and Bayer/Monsanto are fucking terrible, but this is the right decision. If a governmental agency confirms glyphosate is not cancerous (in reasonable doses), why would they need to add a warning label?