A post just in case nobody knows about it. This isn’t a conspiracy post, it can be done, the video link is there by Cyb3rMaddy to explain it more thoroughly. It isn’t new tech, it has been around for more than 10 years. It is just crazy to think that somebody can somehow tap into it, maybe your ISP. Who knows how this is being used today. Since there are no cameras on routers, it is unregulated. Your ISP can theoretically use your home Wi-Fi router to track your movements. By analyzing how your body and walls disrupt and reflect wireless signals a technology known as Wi-Fi sensing, AI models can map exactly where you are, what you’re doing, and even your posture. This is wild to think about, I am guessing regular people don’t know this, but it can happen. Since this can be done, somebody can use it against you. It can even detect human breathing rhythm and heart rate. Sitting at home and unaware. Your cell phone can be used as an Wi-Fi access point. Another example is your smart fridge that has Wi-Fi, it does send back data to somewhere anyway. Like when you run out of food or something. I would never get one of those, personally. I totally understand those people that just want to move to a cabin in the woods somewhere.
You must realize that those undermine your point, right?
Only the one abour spy cam, as i say in edit. But this data not available and need special ai training to identify for each router.
Ah, I see you’re thinking like a researcher and not as an oppressor, fellow anon.
The former focuses on evidence-supported results, and rightfully so, whereas the latter barely aims at a hint of the flimsiest legal precedence in “identifying” individuals before “confirming” they’re “terrorists”.
In short, the implied argument that positive ID of a target individual within said structure is paramount for a kill order is irresponsibly naive, but I hear the hope that fuels it.
Untold numbers of innocents are slaughtered every single year in gov’t sanctioned events based on intel that was half-assed/hurried/redacted (or deliberately poisoned), and we’re generally only seeing the ones that the “police” murder without consequence. (Though, with the advent of televising military actions via “news” programming, we can now see those bootlickers murder civilians w/ barely an “oopsie”, too.)
No. This tech is already more than functional for their needs, and has been for at least a generation now, if not longer.
If anyone reading this is still on the fence, I suggest you take a more critical look at the wording in the reports of said innocents’ deaths.
The “wrong place, wrong time” excuse is disgustingly pervasive, and in flagrant (and intentional) disregard for the victims in their own homes, cars, workplace, school, et al. —nevermind the indefensible fact that none of them had anything to do with the stated intent of said police/military activity.
To sum up: they’ll “ID” the target, label it hostile, and rush to play Momma’s Favorite Crusader on whomever the lucky innocent is that day. Could be any of us, and statistically will be, if things keep escalating along this arc.