• jaselle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This is a rather poor argument against the U.S. takeover of Greenland. If neither Denmark nor the U.S. is better, then it makes no difference if the U.S. takes over.

    Edit: not sure why I’m being downvoted. I would appreciate someone explaining the headline to me because I honestly don’t get it.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      A thought experiment:

      Suppose, for something to “better” or “worse”, it would have to surpass some absolute threshold of “goodness”. This would mean “betterness” is no longer transitive with “worseness”.

      If this were the case, then it’s possible for American colonization to still be worse than Danish colonization without Danish colonization being better than American colonization. Neither would meet the requirement for being “better” and as such are incomparable, but both would be meet the requirement of being “worse” and can be compared in that respect.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah you tell those native people what’s good for them. You know better than them. Those silly native people who have dealt with colonizers for centuries and have all this experience with it they can’t know more than you can. No you’re the good kind of colonizer I’m sure.

      • Willy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re at a hospital and you have 5/10 pain. You have two options, one gets you 3/10 pain and the other gets you 7/10 pain. Which is better for your pain situation? Is neither better because neither is 0/10?

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          And you being such an intelligent doctor can tell the patients how much pain they are experiencing and don’t even need their input right? That sounds ethical.

          • Willy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            This isn’t about doctor or patients or colonies or oppression. It’s about the word “better” and how they objectively misused it and undermined what they were trying to express by doing so.