• fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      “I poo at work because I get paid for it”.

      That doesn’t mean my primary motivation for pooing is getting paid.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Except that interpretation falls apart with the prefatory “not because” clause.

        “I ___, not because ___. Because ___” is an explicit clarification of intention or motivation. “I poo at work, not because I have poo inside me that needs to be expelled. Because it’s a way to get paid for not actually doing work” is a more accurate analogy.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          “I , not because . Because _” is an explicit clarification of intention or motivation.

          Sure, but is it a clarification of intention or motivation for dating, or for dating at work.

          I poo because I have poo inside me that needs to be excreted. I poo at work because I get paid for not actually doing work.

          There’s lots of benefits to dating - companionship, entertainment, engagement, sex, and so on. In some cultural settings in some demographics it’s an expectation that single people will be dating. This post isn’t explaining why she dates, but why she dates at work.