I’m ideologically transparency extremist. This means I want absolute openness for everyone. Overwhelming majority of people on lemmy and other places disagree with me, which means that statistically I’m wrong.
I have some strong arguments for my side and most argumentation from your side is just common trolling or logical fallacies, which makes me think that I’m correct.
Even with that, the software I use is probably more private than solid portion of members of this community, becuase almost everything I use is open source.
I want to give your side another chance. I hope for polite and fruitful discussion.
You can practice transparency extremism on yourself. Your life your choices.
But don’t you think making others share everything against their will is unethical?
Don’t you think that enforcing laws on others is unethical? What about vaccines?
Society would be just better if it were transparent, so you need to force it.
Communists want to start a revolution without much support, because they think everyone would like the final effect
yes they’re unethical and pragmatic. Like how you sometimes have to shoot a bear to save people. If you are in better circumstances you can keep both the bear and the people safe.
If you can achieve the same result without enforcing vaccination or laws on those who don’t want that’s preferable.