• kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, nuclear is good.

      As long as it is properly operated and well regulated.

      Under the current US regime, I can’t trust that to be the case.

  • A_be_seedy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nuclear is good. And gas is better than coal.

    In Ohio, all of the Co-ops are running on 100% coal bay-bee! This is despite being owned by the customers.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      None of the things you just listed are practical, efficient, sustainable or realistic compared to alternative energy.

      • A_be_seedy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        None of my comment was inaccurate.

        It did demonstrate that TVA was doing better on energy generation than co-ops - which is an area where green energy should in theory be easier to attain.

        Your comment seems to imply that I pulled those 3 generation sources out of my ass and claimed they’re the best. I actually just read the headline.

        You claimed that nuclear was not practical, efficient, sustainable, or realistic in comparison to alternate energy sources. This is not an accurate claim.