• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    13 days ago

    What a horse shit title. “Retaliating”…

    You started a war with someone, you aren’t retaliating for shit. You are/have/and will always be the aggressor. The excuses for this war he gave was “they are making something all our resources say they arent making”. “Oh but also we already blew all of that up so they could never make it again, I called it complete annihilation”

    The entire world saw Donald Trump terminate a deal with Iran that they wouldn’t make nuclear weapons. Then all our Intel showed they weren’t making weapons, then when Trump claimed they were, Iran went to the UN and told them they had no problem starting up the program where they monitor that they are not making nuclear weapons.

    Trump bombs them directly after they brought that proposal to the UN… When he himself got rid of the agreement.

    NBC should be shut down for calling this a “response”.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 days ago

        “just 2 more weeks bro and they’ll have a nuke” - same bullshit excuse to fuck with em for 50 years now

              • mrdown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                13 days ago

                The usa has 19 guns pointed at iran called bases and again american inteligence said iran is not seeking nukes

                • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  American ‘intelligence’ said they were not building an actual bomb yet

                  But then, once you have enough HE uranium, building the bombs is the easy part

                  So how smart would it be to let them get to the easy part before you try to stop them?

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        The IAEA reported they never have created and didn’t instead to create something more than 150% the concentration than their machines could do… You know the machines monitored by the U.N. we watched

        • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Please enlighten us on how the Iranian centrifuges supposedly ‘have a limit’ because the IAEA clearly doesn’t know what they’re doing with all their alarmism

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            13 days ago

            Okay sure. How much uranium did the IAEA report Iran make that was weapons grade. The answer is 0. All uranium collected could be made weapons grade by any country. So the largest collector Kazakhstan, would be the biggest threat right? No because it was never about uranium. 8 days ago the U.S. signed a deal with Saudi Arabia asking them to collect/enrich Uranium with no enrichment limitations.

            You know the country that 15 out of 19 of the suicide bombers from 9/11 came from.

            Uranium enrichment was never the worry.

            We attacked Iran because it benefited Israel and Trump thought it would benefit the Republican party in the upcoming elections. He was right about helping Israel, hopefully he’s wrong about the second

              • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                13 days ago

                They don’t enrich it, they sell it to other countries who can/do enrich it, one actively expanding its borders with an invasion into a country we are supposedly trying to defend.

                So if Trump said we were attacking Iran because they were selling Russia drones used in their invasion it would have made more sense.

                But once more, we aren’t attacking Iran for any reason other than to help Israel and to help Republicans hold offices in the election, just like Trump has been posting publicly online for 15 years now.

                • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  You’ve gone from claiming that “Iran can’t even enrich uranium to weapons grade!” to pointing in every possible direction you can think of…

                  You should reflect on what brought you to posting that original claim

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        American inteligence said iran never seeked a nuke. Even if they wanted a nuke, the usa do not have the tight to start the war and the legsl way was to adress the issue in the security council