Making sure you're not a bot!
quokk.au
  • Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?

A mod in [email protected]

  • What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

Deleted comment comment on Healthy ruleationships in [email protected]
Reason: Rude and excessively confrontational × 32

  • Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entries (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).

📸

  • Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).

notice my jovial “⚡”🔗

  • Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Removal of a very cordial & jovial explanation of my anarchist stance regarding monogamy was misread as “rude and confrontational.” I ended conversations respectfully, not expecting backlashes of monogamists in what I thought was a very sarcastic post “Healthy ruleationships.” All I want is the comments returned. The thread can stay locked if the community wishes, and I will not engage in it anymore.

That is all.

  • alapakala@quokk.auOPEnglish
    12·
    26 days ago

    Remember, the sweetest revenge against your haters is to live your best life.

    I didn’t make that line! @[email protected] did, and that comment is still up!

    what you called out as patronizing is this

    Show the full part about dishonesty! That comment doesn’t even show up on the logs!

    I don’t even know what you are trying to claim?

    I already explained myself to @[email protected] cordially. Did you not read the rest of that on purpose‽

    • TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      4·
      26 days ago

      I didn’t make that line! @[email protected] did, and that comment is still up!

      I know, and I’m saying that that part of what was said to you did sound patronizing, but you didn’t call that out and instead called out something non-patronizing

      Show the full part about dishonesty! That comment doesn’t even show up on the logs!

      That part is irrelevant to whether you were being patronized

      I already explained myself to @[email protected] cordially. Did you not read the rest of that on purpose‽

      I did read it, and I understood it but, like someone else said, you seemed to be having your own 1-sided conversation at them. You quoted them but weren’t actually responding to what you were quoting

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        4·
        26 days ago

        did read it, and I understood it but, like someone else said, you seemed to be having your own 1-sided conversation at them. You quoted them but weren’t actually responding to what you were quoting

        I wouldn’t say they were attempting to be super rude or anything, maybe a bit sassy if anything, but I didn’t mind. My biggest issue was that there were a lot of miscommunications and lack of clarity, I think mainly due to their responses being a bit logically scattered. They tended to make leaps in conclusions, causing them to make rebuttals against claims I never made.