The excuse for Russia’s war was “De-Nazification.” It is literally taking them longer to “De-Nazify” Ukraine than it did for them to De-Nazify Nazi Germany and all of the 3rd Reich. Russia today is weak compared to what she once was.

This map doesn’t look like the Russian backed government is doing okay:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1NI5R3Zb6v2d6effVqrmvrFG6T2ZGRsU&ll=12.572036203249803%2C-2.4126179638585388&z=6

Russia’s military capacity has a lot of variables. Adoption of drone warfare is one component. Population, popular support, healthy economics, logistics, etc. all play a part. Russia can improve in one niche and still regress overall.

That reply was incoherent. Russia is making decisions that make Russia weak.

The US maintains four military bases in Bulgaria. You can talk once Bulgarians do to these bases what happened to Russia in Mali.

Your own military bloggers are sounding the alarm bell. Besides, a healthy Russia doesn’t lose control of Mali & Moldova in the same week.

At this pace, Russia can keep “proving us wrong” for the next 200 years and still not achieve victory!

The Gulf States are partnering with Ukraine for drone technology, not Russia. Russia may be making advances, but at a rate much slower than Ukraine, which is why Russia still has not achieved the aims of this stupid war.

Your list should include pros and cons. Which is your country?

If, over the next 10 years, your country became more and more like China, would you go along with the changes? Would you have any problems with the transformation?

Are you aware that the word meat is also use to describe the fleshy part of an edible plant?

How a word is used matters. For Catholics, it is carne, any warm blooded land animal.

When using the word, different people mean different things. Catholics are not making scientific statements when talking about meatless Fridays. Scientists are not trying to upset culinary experts who include fleshy edible plants.

Catholics who don’t eat meat during Lent.

Theoretically, this would actually help the bottom 80% of Americans whose livelihoods are not coupled with asset ownership.

I hope everyone cools off and finds a better solution. That’s said, blocking both straits hurts Africa, China, Europe, and others, but the US is much less impacted. Why aren’t they using tactics that’ll challenge the US?

The article didn’t give any arguments about the law. It mostly discussed how the idea of military action is popular among Cubans living in Florida.

How do their financial costs compare to alternatives line Briar?