Which web apps only run in Chrome but not in other Chromium-based browsers?

Look at the footer; I made the website with Hugo and used a theme called ‘mana’ from their theme store. It’s possible the theme is vibe-coded.

It’s been about 6 months after deleting WhatsApp, and there are no issues at all. only peace of mind.

Actually, it’s the opposite. In many countries other than America, WhatsApp is the default messenger for everything, including government services. And all these privacy flaws also affect them too.

Me too. via NextDNS.

😅 😂

Because Mozilla VPN is a paid service. But actually there are more well-maintained VPN providers available for a decent price with a strict no-log policy. for example, IVPN, Mullvad, Windscribe, Proton, etc., so there is no need to use the Mozilla VPN. Also, Mozilla VPN is based on Mullvad.

Btw, Mozilla has its own VPN, and I don’t recommend using it.

Ecosia has desktop browsers too? I have never heard about it at all. Anyway, I am not interested in that company at all.

They claim to be environment friendly by planting trees and still uses AI. That’s really weird.

The VPN is not its own. Vivaldi partnered with Proton VPN. The company always offered free servers at unlimited bandwidth. So all the appreciation goes to Proton. Also, when you are clicking on the VPN, it auto-installs the ProtonVPN extension from the Webstore and says you need to sign in. I mean, it’s not too hard to search and install ProtonVPN from the webstore. For me, that VPN icon does not look like a wonderful thing done by Vivaldi.

no matter how many controls it gave. Everything always feels half-baked. For example, why can’t Vivaldi read web page contents like Edge does?

I didn’t say “brave” is a goat. I said Brave has some good features compared to Vivaldi. I also mentioned ungoogled Chromium and Helium, which seems like it didn’t catch your eye. Only you noticed, brave, right? Good!

Sorry, what are you trying to say? and what’s with ecosia? isn’t it a search engine?

Am not promoting Brave but saying what the drawbacks I found in Vivaldi when daily driving it. Sadly no browser is perfect.

There is an extension called chrome mask on Firefox. It helps Firefox pretend to be Chrome on certain websites.

Is Ironfox on Linux too?

Not updating the browser for any reason is not a solution; it is opening yourself up to the threats on the modern web. Please don’t do it.

I know they need to make money to thrive and compete against the competitors, but there is too much to tweak after each update. And it’s really disturbing just because of how Firefox once was.

But by not doing what users need, how is it actually going to stay? Is money the only needed thing for Firefox to survive? Not users?

I don’t have any issue with Firefox trying to make some money by doing such things, but all these features are causing the system to use a lot of RAM too. Once we praised Firefox as being the less memory-hogging browser in Linux, but if it is going this way, not anymore.

I called it bloatware because nowadays it is filled with bloat features no matter what.

We said Vivaldi is closed source just because they didn’t publish some part (the unique design) of their code.

We call Brave Bloat because of its crypto stuff.

Now Firefox has promotional links, suggestions, tracking stuff, etc.; then why not call Firefox a bloatware?

By the way, if the contract with Google ended, then why is the default search engine still Google? Also, what is perplexity doing there?

The developer directly mentions “No warranties or guarantees of security or updates or even stability!” in the GitHub page.

As of now, Firefox for Android supports many extensions by default. I believe this browser is not essential anymore in any sense and is not published in any known app stores, so users are required to update it manually.

But that’s not my question. 😐