- 3 Posts
- 25 Comments
1·20 days agoThanks for mentioning that. I haven’t heard of Reticulum before, but it sounds interesting.
No problem. So grapheneOS will definitely prioritize security more than the others. But ultimately, it still relies on hardware that, by its very nature, cannot be trusted. Similarly, even the developers at grapheneOS can make mistakes. Therefore, you should generally view such systems as compromised and not trust them blindly. Then there are also methods like uXDT, where devices communicate with each other via sound (a frequency we cannot hear), and so on. Thats the reason I call it honeypotOS.
It would be better to prove that it is secure. If you think about last year, for example (That applies to Qualcomm, so you’d have to check what hardware is installed. ) —CVE-2026-25262(But it’s only now making headlines)—the question remains: what hasn’t been discovered yet?
Oh look, grapheneOS was vulnerable… but it’s been fixed now https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/35355-details-on-the-may-2026-android-security-bulletin (not same CVE)
The focus is still on what has been discovered; the question remains: what has not yet been discovered?
Oh wrote wrong person xD
Yeah, okay, when it came to Mullvad, I made a huge mistake in my thinking regarding data retention within the EU.
Well, either way, the future looks pretty dystopia. We’re just at the beginning of total surveillance. I wouldn’t be surprised if GitHub, GitLab, and the like were targeted soon. Or if they took action against something like GrapheneOS, etc. I’m losing interest more and more because of all these plans…
deleted by creator
You’re faster than I am at editing xD
How did you think of me right away, when I’ve hardly been online lately? :D Especially since I’m so unimportant. xD
Because of the pixels… I used to think about it, but I don’t want Google hardware. I’ve also turned down iPhones that people wanted to gift me. I could have resold them, but nah.
Yeah, my next phone will also be one that I can flash with Linux. Right now I have a Chinese spy Xiaomi.
I use a totally ordinary Android phone with nothing important on it because I generally don’t trust the thing. Leave my cute cats out of this. xD I’d rather have a device knowing that I can’t trust it in principle than rely on an operating system when you still can’t trust the hardware.
But yea its me. Hey vik xD
https://youtu.be/fM5w7bFNvWI A great talk at 39C3
Oh, so you just believe everything… Every CPU has undocumented instruction sets… For hardware to be trustworthy, it would have to be open-source… but that goes for SS7 and the like too… Oh, whatever—just trust your honeypot
You can’t trust mobilephones. Simple
Fresh on hardware with undocumented instruction sets, etc. It continues to use the mobile network with SS7, etc.
Securephones (cryptophones) are banned for reason
Why limit it to specific hardware and so on? They chase after the sweet honey and fall into the trap like sheep.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
If you downvote something, you can explain why.
https://gofile.io/d/PDl7oC (You can watch it without downloading it) Here is a video about Chrome, Chromium, and Brave. I really should test this across multiple user accounts, since I’ve read that this can also expose data from other user accounts. In any case, for the demonstration, I used a string to perform a targeted search. After the browser was closed, the cache should have been cleared, but that didn’t happen.
(Windows users can ask ChatGPT: “How can I create a memory dump from my browser in Windows and search it for strings?” it should be easy too without thirdparty tools )
(On Linux, simply run
sudo gcore $(pidof BROWSERNAME)
strings core.* | grep STRINGReplace BROWSERNAME and STRING)
PS: Please excuse my typos in the video—it’s still early in the morning. 🤣
Just Cox Media?
So the whole uXDT thing is being ignored?!? Lol