

Based on what rationale?


Based on what rationale?


My stance? What about stance?
Thats good for you, I usually dont preach to people about how to interact with the Internet, but thats just me.


Ive already said i was wasted when I pulled that figure out of my ass.
And the other guy has already acknowledged that the underlying sentiment that is has become a lot more efficient is true.
If they need more than that, its there for them whenever they want.


More what?
You’re not the best conversationalist but its good that you’re working on it.


No.
?
When you lock onto something really hard in a discussion like this it becomes very obvious you’re faltering and dont really have much to contribute.


Yeah I can tell you dont want to look into it, that comes across very clear 😂


You’re just repeating the same point I’ve just addressed, so I’ll explain in more detail.
Data centres expanding is perfectly compatible with huge efficiency gains per token. If the cost of inference falls, companies can afford to run vastly more inference, serve more users, use larger models and embed AI into more products.
It’s the same reason more fuel-efficient cars didn’t eliminate demand for roads or petrol. Efficiency lowers the cost of using something, which can increase total consumption.
So “if software got more efficient, they wouldn’t need more data centres” is basically backwards. The relevant question is whether total AI demand is growing faster than efficiency is improving.


You can find token energy efficiency information studies online, I was smashed when I pulled that figure out of my arse but the numbers are similarly huge.
They’re already orders of magnitude more energy efficient than we predicted just a few years ago and both the software and the hardware continue to accelerate that.


You’re forgetting that usage can still go up while token cost goes down.
Or rather, efficiency and usage can increase at the same time.


Global solar generation has increased by 50% in the last 2 years, meanwhile a token is something like 900 times less energy consuming than it was a year ago?
Something comes first, almost free energy and deeply embedded ai usage or total environmental collapse, capitalism deems that we will find out which in due course.


Seeing europe in this orientation really threw me for a moment.


There is a valid argument that the EU is not a perfect system, particularly from a democratic standpoint.
But at this point its like saying the local supermarket is bad so I have chosen to go without food for two weeks. Its just not working out how you hoped.


Recently begun medication and am able to skip the entirety of the green, now I have hours where there is nothing that needs doing.
How do normal people deal with this.
Hes not ass-fucker-guy.
Some people have friends all over the world that cant make the journey.
Recently had this for a family funeral, 40/50 people from South Africa asked if it could be live-streamed. The immediate family didnt like the idea, but i can appreciate why they asked.


You fully cant exist in modern society without ethical problems. You draw your own line.
If you’re not giving money, and you’re ensuring your plex-shared friends arent giving money, thats a valid enough degree of separation for many, potentially most.


Several steps removed here.


Removed by mod


That’s middle aged in Europe, they’re endless
The original point was that expanding data centres doesn’t disprove a big increase in efficiency per token. Usage, advsnced models/tokens per query and infrastructure can all grow at the same time as the energy required for an individual token falls. And thats an ongoing process.
Companies you know cutting token spend, you thinking ubiquitous AI adoption is unrealistic, and newer models using more tokens per query are all arguments about future/total demand. None of them actually tell us whether a token is dramatically cheaper or more energy efficient to produce than it was a year ago. Realistically thats a learning curve problem, if someone is throwing a basic question at a model far more complex than it needs they are creating the inefficiency and that needs to be made more obvious/streamlined.
I’ve not claimed demand had increased 900x. You inferred that from the existence of new data centres, which was the faulty bit of reasoning I was responding to in the first place.