It would appear you’d rather disregard sources that detail the BBC’s complicity in Genocide rather than engage with the evidence
but here’s a couple more for good measure
Witnessing undone: silence, noise and the enabling of genocide in Gaza
Thankfully I don’t see it as much on here as much as it used to be around the peak of the election, where I’d see (self proclaimed) liberals ignoring the reality and instead argue that his hands were tied or that he’s totally working tirelessly for a ceasefire or that it was irrelevant to winning the race. I still see establishment Dems holding this view, especially during the controversy of the DNC refusing to release the autopsy
Well if Genocide happens under a Dem it’s different /s
Of course they’ll do something! They’ll fund it and criminalize the critics
Well you ignored 3 separate articles detailing how the BBC’s complicity in Genocide, saying that you’d only consider academic articles in particular. Then once I provided 2 academic articles on the subject in addition to the others, no response. It comes off like you’re more interested in bias confirmation than in investigation