Tbf, my experience with Gog achievements has been quite bad even with paid games played via Galaxy. While most worked, some achievements triggered silently, some on the following game start, and some straight up didn’t work. Maybe it was a problem on the game side, but anyway if some games have bad Gog achievements, maybe it’s less worth it to get those working.

Currently, it only supports Goldberg Steam Emulator, as other emulators may use different achievement formats.

Very nice option, thx for sharing, but isn’t it limited to Steam games?

Yeah, my name isnt on those either, neither is yours i guess, as well as most people in this community.

Oh yes, big time, and in two ways : first, what they consume for themselves, and second, the excedent they make you and your neighbors consume (wrapping everything in plastic, selling stuff that traveled the globe because it’s more profitable, etc.), shadowing or running out of business more local and sustainable alternatives.

Wow, that’s wonderfully crafted to have a mix of pertinent points and bended facts to get a tight leninist propaganda. You’re completely occulting the fact that anarchists integrated the red army only because they were outnumbered, fought the red army itself when able to, that even anarchists truly loyal to bolshevik power were arrested and disbanded, and nicely playing along the underlying assumption that it’s weird anarchists joined soviets : it’s not, they were pro-soviets, they fought for soviets free of bolshevik control. Yes to left unity, no to rewriting history.

On one hand i clearly agree with you about the overmedicalization issue, on the other hand there also was an undermedicalization going on for centuries, especially in the autism/ADHD/etc fields. It’s a tough balance to get, cuz the rise of diagnoses may not indicate an overmedicalization, but rather a correction of the undermedicalization (though the risk of overmed. is real, clearly).

And on the medical condition being part of an identity, i also get your point, but it’s also important to consider that making your differences part of your identity makes perfect sense, and for a lot of people their differences come from medical conditions. Conflating the two may be slightly unhealthy, but far less than repressing it as non-subject.

I don’t know but if i had to guess it would be what is happening in ancient colonies still attached to France, like i think Mayotte was or is going through a big supplies and water shortage. That or the number are somehow wrong (like calculated differently from country to country)

I’d say hierarchy is present in centralisation too, and inequality as a goal would be the real idea on the top side, but i see your point. Great compass otherwise!

As others said, there are some good GUI if the command line is a bit too hard for you as it was for me. I use Parabolic and so far it’s working like a charm (i only do officials video sites though, don’t know for streaming services)

Heh, debatable. Depends on the surface available, how many of them are already organized in campers groups, the definition of formal, etc. But i’ll concede you the point, for it’s not the matter here anyway, neither in the meme nor in the comment.

Hint : the important part here is deciding, instead of imposed. If i go camping in a field, there is no border between me and my neighbor, but we will tend to hang around our own tents more. This is built on nothing more than will, as opposed to borders.

To my eyes, both you and @nutcase2690 are right about those unclear cases of hierarchies.

Anarchy rejects hard-structured hierarchies, that’s for sure. But if we take a more general definition of hierarchies and authorities, then there is the possibility for more “fluid” hierarchy, both in a good and bad way.

About the good way, i believe Bakunin wrote a passage i like about it in God and the State, pointing out that anarchist recognize the authority of some people when it’s meaningful (like trusting the orders/guiding of an architect when building a house). He also points out that what matters is the possibility to end this authority : it has to be temporary and/or linked to a task, to automatically enable the possibility of stopping recognizing this authority. You’d also have to be wise enough yourself to identify when to give your obedience/trust and to who, and this implies that this is not a precise science, we have to accept that sometimes people will make the wrong call and respect the authority of someone they shouldn’t or vice-versa.

About the bad way, as you pointed out, all this really opens for the possibility of informal majority oppression or leader oppression. One imperfect solution to this is precisely the possibility for anyone to refuse authority at any time for any reason. Another safeguard is to speak about this and call out situations that tend to it and look like it : positive point here, the fact that anarchist and leftists organizations are known and mocked for bickering and splitting perpetually is a sign that they already do this (not great for movement unity though but heh, this is what we’re working with).

There will be no definitive victory and perpetual state of anarchy, we’ll always have to fight against temptations of power structures, especially when they’ll come back in those informal forms once we get rid of the formal ones. But if you can get rid of a state, preventing weaker forms of it should be a walk in the park.

So you … agree with the post that indigenous people were on the right track before colonization, according to your number goals/analysis, and that eco-fascists are wrong to call all human disease rather than pointing out capitalism ?

But moreover, i’m interested in where you get your numbers from. I’m convinced that being less would make solving problems easier, but i’m also convinced that being less alone would not solve anything and that it cannot be an ethically reliable goal/tool with so much people caring so much about having kids, and most importantly every person with knowledge on the matter told me that we have the capacity to feed all 10B people, so i’m quite intrigued by your take.

My guess is that everything lies in defining “healthy” and “pre-modern civ”. What about modern sustainable-ish agricultural practices ? From what i know, they’re not that far behind conventional production yield-wise.