Covfefe

Comparison to reddit.

No.

Yeah ok fair, for “one and done” projects I do indeed believe that LLMs can be a useful tool. For maintainable code instead of write-once code, which is what I am 99% working with, I believe they suck. So my definition of “good” would be a lot stricter.

So, Claude was given the explanation on its training data. Not hugely surprising.

Honest question. If you claim you are not good enough to build it, how can you evaluate that what you are getting is good or not?

I know of one shitty ticketmaster-like site that I may unfortunately have to use like once a year.