I respectfully disagree about giving Nazi’s attention.
You should pay attention long enough to them to punch them in the face, or take a bat to their knees. And it’s very important that you pay them attention when aiming a gun at them, as you don’t want to hit innocent bystanders.
Though those are the only exceptions I can think of, everything else you’re spot on about.
I appreciate the “libertarian” and libertarian being presented here. A distinction most people aren’t aware enough to make.
;the owning class needs to have their power stripped from them, and they aren’t gonna give it willingly. That will only ever happen through violence, be it state or non state, threats or actions. There is no other way to accomplish it, and anyone who thinks we can do it peacefully is wrong.
Favorite part about your post, because it’s just pure fact. There just isn’t any other viable solution, even if many of us wish it was otherwise.
Seriously, pacifism is an evil idealogy that a lot seem to subscribe to as if it is some noble ideal. When in reality it is a selfish one that requires you to stand by as the meek and innocent are trampled, as your friends, family and community are trampled. It is isolationism for the individual.
Which is difficult due to the many barriers put in by the two major parties to getting on the ballot. Many third parties spend a lot of their funds just trying to get on the ballot and defending against law suits put out by major party candidates. Leaves very little for campaigning or advertisement, relying almost solely on word of mouth and volunteers. And of course each state runs their own elections, so there is never a one size fits all solution. Plus, the rules are constantly changing and generally becoming more difficult.
Going to say no to that, but not because I disagree with the content but because today is a day where getting enough dopamine is difficult. I will however save it and hope it doesn’t get doomboxxed so I can enjoy the content when I’m capable of giving it the attention it deserves.