

Once you’re comfortable with (neo)vim, is there any reason to use nano?


Once you’re comfortable with (neo)vim, is there any reason to use nano?


Sir/Lady, you are talking on the internet. People won’t know where your “here” is 😉


Yes. Violence, by definition, requires physical force
It’s possible to define it like that, but it’s definitely not universally the case and seems overly restrictive. Just one example from the WHO’s World report on violence and health:
Violence at work involves not only physical but also psychological behaviour. Many workers are subjected to bullying, sexual harassment, threats, intimidation and other forms of psychological violence.


Words are not physical violence
The person you respond to didn’t say that words are physical violence.
Do you believe the only form of violence is physical violence?


Tonight, our long-range sanctions reached the Moscow region again: for the second time in a week, the Moscow Oil Refinery was hit. Targets in the Rostov region and in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine were also hit. A completely fair response to Russian strikes on our cities and communities and another important result of the work of our soldiers on the facilities that provide support for the Russian military machine. Thank you to our Defense and Security Forces of Ukraine for their joint work - the SBU, SBS, SSO, GUR, and our missile brigade for their accuracy.
These days, all our partners have noted the accuracy and effectiveness of our middle strikes and long-range sanctions. It is time to end this war, and Russia must take the necessary steps in diplomacy.


Amnesty International, Human Rights International, and Israeil human rights organisations Yesh Din and B’Tselem have said the same thing.


What kind of messed up reality do those 20% of Reform voters who want a second Brexit vote live in?


Yes. But supported by a minority.
First-past-the-post is a terrible voting system.


Improving both physical and mental health.


What do you do that’s impractical in NixOS?


From the blog:
we can promise to listen and be aware. People’s remaining pain point are and will be on our radar, so please take this time to communicate them.
I don’t hear this as “legacy can go to hell”. They care about fixing remaining issues as much as possible.
At some point, that’s a better use of time than maintaining two display servers forever.


Oct. 22, 2019 /PRNewswire/ – The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced today that, for the first time, it has authorized the marketing of products through the modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) pathway. The authorizations are for eight Swedish Match USA, Inc. snus smokeless tobacco products sold under the “General” brand name.
These products had previously been authorized for U.S. sale without modified risk claims by the FDA in 2015 in response to filings of premarket tobacco applications (PMTAs). Today’s action further authorizes the manufacturer to market these specific products with the claim “Using General Snus instead of cigarettes puts you at a lower risk of mouth cancer, heart disease, lung cancer, stroke, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis.” The FDA made this authorization after reviewing scientific evidence submitted by the company that supports this claim. In an effort to help prevent youth access and exposure, the agency has also placed stringent advertising and promotion restrictions on the products, including a requirement to restrict advertising to adults. In addition, the products’ packaging and advertising must also bear the warning statements required for all smokeless tobacco products.
In Blackburn, England.