looks nice, but could be very toxic depending on how old the system is.
The old version of this foam did contain hella much PFAS.
You can find it now in basically every groundwater around military airfields. And there are bunch of law suits from ex aircraft carrier crew about this because they where not told the foam is toxic and they had to clean up the foam without protection after fire drills.
“airplanes emit around 400 tons of lead every ear in the US, and it’s not much of a problem.”
uhhhh have u seen the us recently?
Genau so schaft man motivation bei den Arbeitslosen, nicht.
kein orginal saft meimei ohne diese
lmao i did make this edit, quite some time ago but i remember lol
It was in response to someone using AI to make the same meme (on c/ich_iel), and i was so pissed about seeing bernd in AI that i made a version of it using Krita.
https://sh.itjust.works/post/46686221
Its always nice to see memes circle back months later :D
downvoted for ai usage
thats how it should be
FunFact! Jobcenter hat mich heute zum info tag der Bundeswehr im Jobcenter eingeladen, die lage muss also ernst sein wenn sie versuchen leute wie mich zu bekommen die absolut untauglich sind…
“i dont care about anyhting but my own time slot” attitude
ah yeah tell me more how neat uranium mines are cleaned up and how they not spread radioactive dust over the landscape. tell me more about how solar pannels cant be recycled and have to be watched for millions of years so nobody touches em
“I had AI provide a response”
i stopped reading right there, dont waste my time.
Because people call nuclear cheap, when it in reality isnt, they just cherry pick a smol time slot while ignoring states pumping money into it before and after main run time.
Bruh i saw this trash of a bait post yesterday already.
Nobody with more than 3 brain cells is defending coal. But Nuclear is also shit (unless u have subs to run or nukes to build, and hence can use civil nuclear plants, refining, and mining to offload some of the military bill onto the backs of civilians).
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A SINGLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT THAT WAS PROFITABLE THUOUT ITS WHOLE LIFE CIRCLE.
Take your god damn bait meme and shove it up your reactor pressure vessel.
Common sense. And if u to lazy to find me a single profitable nuclear powerplant…dont call me the dummy.
Strange? How can that be if Nuclear is “so cheap”…sooo many power plants and u cant find a single one that isnt burning state money to run or clean up after.
Meanwhile solar is so profitable now that even for home usage its worth it to normal people…oh and its also decentral how nice.
Digging shit out of the earth that will poision everthing with radioactive dusts miles around the mine…then using it for a while before not having a solution to store it…makes only sense when you have to run a submarine for national security or a deepspace probes power generator.
But that itself would be very expensive so why no offload some of the mining and refining cost onto the civilians…
Nobody here is trying to defend coal lmao
Name a single Nuclear power plant that was profitable over its whole live cycle without depending on state money for at least one of the phases, from planing it to tearing it down and long time storage of the waste till its save again.
Nuclear only makes economic sense if you also have a military use for the fuel.
If you dont have nuke warheads, or subs that depend on it…it makes no economic sense.
Die gründe für den erhalt der massenluftfahrt sind ähnlich wie bei der Atomkraft…dual use.
Man braucht die Flugfelder und Treibstoff Infrastruktur für den Kriegsfall. Und solange kein krieg ist…können die zivilisten ja die rechnung mit tragen.
Zudem wenn sich Achim nich alle paar monate auf malle die birne wegsaufen kann wachsen vielleicht die gehirnzellen nach und er hört auf cdu zu wählen.