• 0 Posts
  • 364 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2026

help-circle









  • jtrek@startrek.websitetoCoupleMemes@sh.itjust.works•Clingy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    I had a partner for a little while that would do the “good morning!” texts. Didn’t especially enjoy that. I like some actual content. Even if it’s fluffy like “the dog saw a squirrel and I had to carry her the rest of the way home because she was obsessed”

    Give me something to work with.

    I also had a partner for a few months that wouldn’t respond for days. That was bad. Glad that one ended.




  • I got a friend to play Path of Exile with me once. They hadn’t really played a lot of video games before. When they leveled up and it did all the sparkly lights they were like “oooh wow!!”

    I was like oh, I guess I’m numb to that thrill since I’ve seen it a million times. But the sparkle reward was fresh for them and got their attention.



  • Ah I see. I’m not sure where the line is between “merely wrong” and “mad”.

    Like, if you tell me the population of London is 5 million, that’s wrong but plausible. If you tell me it’s twelve people that’s absurd.

    So when I look at privatization I can’t see any path where it works out for the majority of people that isn’t entirely wishful thinking. There’s no mechanism where private ownership of public resources and infrastructure works out in the long term. Believing in it seems so egregiously wrong it’s another category. Like someone believing that letting the foxes watch the hens will yield more eggs. There’s no good reasons to believe that, but plenty of Fox written propaganda.

    Though I am sort of backed into a corner in that I was sort of firing from the hip. I don’t have the most robust argument for my “maybe written on the toilet” posts. “Mad” might not be the best word. “Foolish and poorly informed” maybe?


  • To me it seems perfectly plausible that changing the incentive structure around how a company is operated would have a way bigger impact than that.

    I feel confident one can change incentives and operational practices without privatizing.

    So you’ve got to put yourself in the shoes of someone who fervently believes that there is a lot of waste in the public sector.

    Some people are delusional but I’m not sure the value of spending a lot of time in their shoes. In the US many people fervently believe the Republicans are “better at the economy” despite evidence pointing otherwise.

    And just to emphasise, the idea of privatisation was not “let some rich people become richer.” It was to sell shares in privatised companies to as many people as possible, and make investors out of all of us.

    This seems like an inefficient way to share public wealth that gives advantage to the wealthy. Let’s say you’re correct and the value of the shares goes from 10 to 100. People who bought more shares profit more. People with more money on hand can buy more shares. It’s a large advantage to the wealthy.

    As you said

    making some decent money but yielding the longer-term benefits to bigger investors.

    So it sounds like we agree? Privatizing advantages the bigger, wealthier, investors.



  • HR at the horrible mega Corp I work for has been described as “day care”. They all seem to move at a glacial speed, which when you’re dealing with time sensitive tasks I’d say is incompetence.

    The few I’ve talked to are nice, in a polite small talk way, but it just shouldn’t take a whole month to go from application to phone screen. Certainly not for internal candidates.