The status quo of which year? 1989?

authoritarian state-capitalist regimes

Dictionary: libspeak to english

non-western socialist governments

Exactly. You only attack the enemies of usa while leaving usa’s billions of crimes unadressed, making you an imperialist propagandist & kidnapper-bootlicker.

The imperialists’ favorite scammery: Redefining imperialism.

So it’s free from cia stenography, making it more trustworthy? Well that’s good to know.

This always means “I can’t win the argument as long as you’re here” aka “I give up”

Rises sharply with communism. Sinks when communism is replaced with capitalism.

Communists win again.

What now? Wanna compare home ownership rate? Government approval rate? Number of wars mongered?

“Real” people? Are there fake people?

Seems like I put the cart before the horse. Let me elaborate:

Social darwinists can return to monke (and die from recurring famines) if they want. But I will stay in the industrial age, where there’s abundant food, because I don’t want to die.

Ok, let’s compare:

https://lemmy.ml/post/46354189

Thoughts: terminated

Thoughts: terminated

I’d die. You are a murderer.

Name one animal where a hierarchy exists that starves other members of their species from the things they require to live. Name one animal where the hierarchies persist in a form after the individual at the top dies. Name one animal where the upper rungs of the hierarchies can punish the lower ones.

I don’t want to return to monke.

Usa rigs almost every election in the world. Collect some evidence about this too, or you’re just an imperialist propagandist (and kidnapper-bootlicker).

Authoritarian is when not ruled by westerners.

The long minus is right here — on my phone keyboard

Apparently it makes conservatives panic — I should probably start using it

Mario party 1. Sometimes the game just continuously fucks you over, with chance time, unwinnable minigames, unlucky dice rolls, bowser, etc.

So i’ll need to compare the potential benefits to the potential downsides.

I’m not joking. Here’s what I think:

The whole game is rigged, it’s like a casino, the house always wins.

It’s never a complete wash, always a close photo finish. This is statistically way too unlikely to not be rigged. The tools you mentioned, those are the tools to rig the elections to 49/51 so the news media corpos get big clicks & big cash. Everyone who participates is more likely to be hooked, that’s even more clicks.

If I were a news media company boss, I’d pay the electoral theater big bills to make it look close, that’s guaranteed ROI. And not only that, it makes the state look more “democratic” than when there’s an 80/20.

The votes that count are those of the big bourgeois. I assume they first decide who will win the 51/49, then they gerrymander it accordingly, and when the votes are still “wrong”, they’ll use other methods.

So your vote will never change the outcome, but it will always make the news corpos make more bank.