nerv

I can feel this to an uncomfortable level.

Art, in every single iteration it has, always tried to elevate civilization and thought.

The Venus of Willendorf, although crude, is perhaps the earliest representation of a feminine figure, most probably a fertility goddess. There is no way to avoid pointing how potentially sexualized the sculpture is/was yet the first considered theory on it points not to an objectified woman-figure but to a superior entity materially embodied in every single woman in existence.

If such a concept does no service to empower women, none does.

In the same line of thought, after that statuette, many other representations of women have been created that do not reduce the woman but instead elevates her. It’s the culture surrounding those representations that - including the present day one - try to label such images as negative.

People often overlook the message. Or ignore it for immediate satisfaction.

I remember reading an article on a bromze statue of a fishmonger woman, in Ireland, if memory serves me well, where the woman os seen pushing her cart along the street, with a very low cut breast dress, which almost exposes her breasts. For some reason, it took on an urban legend that stroking the statues breasts brought good luck and tourists - of all people - made it a thing to do. The local counsel, very disturbed, tried to remove the statue arguing maintenance, then echoing the complaints of citizen groups that argued the statue shed bad light on the town’s image. It took historians to explain why the statue was as it was, down to period clothing and even child care!

The statue had stood in its place for decades with no ill coming its way until puritans decided they had to be bothered on behalf of others. That alone should tell us a good deal.

Maybe we should bring back Egyptian and Greek classical statuary. Naked people, half human/half animal representations, ambiguous sexuality and morphology… Force the dialogue a bit.

The problem isn’t “naked” statues.

The problem is a society that views sex, sexuality and, by extent, any show of body as harmful.

Sexual harrassement is a separate issue and it is rooted much deeper into social precepts, in my understanding.

Regardless of the religious-type language - which can be viewed as just dated - words like “pray” often find their way into day to day speech as placeholders for other words; in this case “hope”.

And that “God” thrown into the salad: I risk I can take a guess from where your sentiment is coming but most people are not zealots and the “God” they appeal to is as best as far as possible from the clerical interpretation as it can get or at worst is just an appeal for a hope on something outside themselves to keep them hopeful for a better day.

Let people be.

Please.