

Using the term and calling others “terrorists” left and right is NOT the proper strategy. You’re just copying/reminding Trump, throwing empty claims and accusations. 💁


Using the term and calling others “terrorists” left and right is NOT the proper strategy. You’re just copying/reminding Trump, throwing empty claims and accusations. 💁


What a messy “proposition”!
A bunch of questinable suggestions, picked randomly around mobile phones generally and (for some weird reason) specific manufacturers
- and slapping in some general claims about affordability of education.
…WUT?!
Like, what are you even specifically targeting?!
Do some actual work, choose a topic. Collect data. Analyze it.
Focus! Choose things/ideas/challenges…/ONE thing you THINK you understand and you THINK you can tackle…
Because when you don’t do at least those things - you get a messy bunch of random things put together.


You keep ignoring the Godwin law - and call others (you disagree with) fascists. This is not tolerable! It’s you who lives in a very, VERY simplified (primitivized, actually) b/w world and false dichotomy.
There is this another dude, who started calling people (he can’t stand) as neonazzi and fascists: Putin. He also claims that Ukraine is not а legitimate country. He even has “historic data” to prove it (all revanchist do)…
And thus Putin, hamas, gretas and other ‘useful idiots’ have united to self-righteously proclaim the rest - as ‘fascists’…
Wow. Grim it is.


Lenin has been claimed to invent the very illustrative term “useful idiots in the West”. Stop looking at the finger - but notice the actual thing I was pointing at! How absolutely greta of you, once again!)
About your unsolicited advice - which I never asked… Ironically, how about you’d follow it yourself:
open your mind a little, I promise you’ll be okay, your brain won’t fall out. The world is nuanced and not the simple false dichotomy you want to believe in.
So, what do your delusions say, what kind of a state “people will get” after a capitalist democracy is “dismantled”, as you dream? Do you expect to be different from what Hitler/Lenin/hamas have attained?
All rhetorical questions though. Good bye - and enjoy still living in a capitalist democracy! “It’s the worst form of government - except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”


Not the first time in the thread you claim not to be pro-China.
And yet, you continue the same anti-capitalist rhetorics to the extreme - even comparing democraticly institutioned capitalism to fascism (omfg!!!), which
must be dismantled
You ARE pro-China and you aro a pro-communist paranoid. One presumably living your happy delusional life somewhere in a democratic state. Right?
Tovarish Lenin (whom you must know or must get to know) has coined a specific term for pro-socialist lunatics in the West: useful idiots. They (the collective you) are back here… Collectively hating the capitalism (from within) and collectively hating ‘militaristic’ Israel.
That’s all sad and grim. Like, greta thunberg grim.


Hamas will certainly come up with ways how to spend your money, just as all the previous money and help poured into Gaza.
You can’t fill a strainer with water nor can you help civilians in Gaza - when they are controled by armed paramilitaries with no civilians’ protection as the priority.


The forbidden creme brulee


It’s either that (what you claim as true about a whole nation) - or you are just a fascist with your crippled mind.
We’ll never know… /S
It looks like you sincerely do not understand my point: instead of a well-thought ‘proposition’ you’ve collected a random youngster’s wishlist of ‘how things could/should work to their liking’.
It’s even more obvious, when you keep broadening your “wishlist” - with random “suggestions” via DM.)
The inclusion of “videogames should work offline” is especially hilarious and telling. 😆 You got other remarks about mobile storage expectancy - and you fail to understand those too, unfortunately…
Please, don’t expect countries/EU would start mandating things some teenager or any random person likes) There should be valid, commonly agreed reasons to enact/mandate some practices as laws. And these mandated practices should be realistic, fair and viable, so that they do not undermine economic growth/opportunities. What bureaucracy often does.