porcoesphino
- 1 Post
- 5 Comments
porcoesphino@mander.xyzto
World News@lemmy.ml•Could we have a rule that prohibits commenting about Media Bias Fact Check?
0·9 months agoOoooh. This is lemmy.ml, oops. I deleted ask anything from here since this group was tiring. But now I can guess why people are upset about the comment even though no one took the time to answer and give a few examples… they just took time to say how upsetting the site was
porcoesphino@mander.xyzto
World News@lemmy.ml•Could we have a rule that prohibits commenting about Media Bias Fact Check?
0·9 months agoThose comments sound great. Why are they an issue? Many if the best comments are basically data not personal point of view
porcoesphino@mander.xyzto
Buy European@feddit.uk•Canadians Favour Gripen over F-35English
1·9 months agoCome on mate. Elbows up
That write up does seem to ignore the doubling down here:
https://lemmy.ca/comment/13913116
Calling out that JD Vance was the only one to answer is pretty troubling to me after reading about some of his new-right ties. It’s way, way too close for my liking to a mouse telling everyone that will listen that the cat was amazing for inviting him and all his friends to his house in a week. ie. Playing into what just seems like an obvious strategy.
That said, I’m pretty ignorant about the CEO. I just remembered this lemmy comment and I didn’t notice it included in the write up that was being linked.



It might be an uneven law that needed review but for now at least, isn’t this change aligned with Citizens United in the US and hasn’t that had some famous consequences we are kind of living through? I’m not arguing the law should be unevenly applied, just that for now there seems to be risk