The other day, one of my bosses said that they no longer wish to hire people who come from wealth, as they make poor employees. They call in sick and dont miss the money and can leave at a drop of a hat. They also found they had stronger boundaries and wouldn’t accept the poor working conditions other people had to put up with. Although, they were at least self aware enough not to use those exact words.

Of course, I wasn’t in a position to say anything out loud but, to myself, I was thinking “why yes, that is a scathing critique of capitalism you have there.”

To me, it depends on whether you plan on having a good faith interpretation of what they said or not.

Again, I don’t disagree with you. However, where is it said that this is specifically what they mean? I feel like we must be reading something different.

While you’re certainly not wrong, I don’t think they were talking about stonewalling or anything done with intent.

Clearly, 8,000,000,000 people must disagree with you, as they didnt all agree…

I did, you just didn’t understand the answer. The lie is you declaring it to be our natural state. How did you miss that?

The fact that a few violent psychopaths managed to subjugate large sections of society doesn’t make it anymore natural than claiming natural order of bovine is to live in a factory farm.

It was right in front of you the whole time. All you had to do was start questioning the first lies you were told as a child and not to accept them as gospel.

I love that you thought this was a rebuttal. Some people never questioned the first lies they were told as a child.