Objectively correct.

So just the first picture then

deleted by creator

You’re welcome. I’m sure the hills you chose to die on and your pretentiousness will make for great company in your lonesome fantasy world. The difference between dumb elitism and constructive criticism is the usefulness and adaptability. I’m thankful for the work the Graphene devs are doing despite some immaturity displayed. No-one else is filling that gap anywhere near as well. If you go around trying to boycott everything made by people who don’t hold up to your asinine standards you wouldn’t be able to survive. I dare you to take a good look at the workers behind everything you consume.

Oh no muh decorum.

In the past we used to say we had functioning regulatory bodies, but they were getting paid for their silence then, and even more now.

Complacency is stupidity.

Titlehate. I have it.

*Airways innit

1,6km

This is a new kind of autism.

Enshittified lemmy user.

Maybe not all Adolfs are bad #notalladolfs

Oué

Sure, but what I’m saying is that at a high level of abstraction scientific discoveries are similarly inevitable as well. I don’t think niche creations are a major difference since as you yourself stated “without him we’d just have something else and perhaps it would’ve been a bit later.”. The majority build on previous findings, often many scientists are working towards the same goals, and truth is truth, whether it be found through physical experimentation or fleshing out applied logic.

Not necessarily against what you said, but I realized you can kinda say that about anything, with some abstraction. There’s always smart people (thankfully), and they’ll often arrive at the same solutions. Roll over, Gauss.

db.txt

Crazy Ubiquitous, Raw, and Ludicrous

They forgot the part where everyone got up and clapped afterward. I’m clapping right now.

Were they actually looking for it?