After a quick search, I found out that the term for what you’re describing seems to be gender apathetic. I’ve met people who seemed a bit apathetic to gender before, so it makes sense that there’s a label for it.
Oh, and don’t forget that non-binary people that use ‘he’ and/or ‘she’ aren’t necessarily gender apathetic. They could, for example, be demigender.
Hello, congratulations for recently becoming a person!
Most people can’t tell the difference between the two, probably because they don’t know how either of them works. And just like others have said, it’s the same thing with CGI. I was watching Avatar 2 the other day and one of my friends said something about the graphics like “oh, that’s probably AI”, and I angrily replied “do you have any idea of how many dozens, if not hundreds of people painstakingly worked on this movie’s CGI??”
Thanks, I went to check. Despite having been a Nintendo fan for years, I haven’t been keeping up with their latest news.
Damn, didn’t expect them to make a Star Fox release, especially after the Star Fox reference in the new Mario movie. I get what they are saying, but I don’t think this was the reason why they did this. I think it has to do with two different things. The first one is the expectations that new Nintendo Switch 2 games are trying to meet. People who bought the Switch 2 expect better graphics and performance that on the OG Switch, so most exclusive titles have been trying to do more visually impressive graphics. “Photorealistic” animals just seems to be part of this team’s idea of visually impressive graphics. The second reason is that, from what I’ve gathered, Star Fox 64 has already had one remake and one “reimagining” before this new title, which will also a remake of Star Fox 64. If this new game looked anything like either Star Fox 64 3D or Star Fox Zero, people would just say “eh, who cares, this is just more of the same that we’ve already got”, and wouldn’t be as excited to buy the game. So they changed the characters’ designs, to make it look different.
Wait, what new Starfox character designs?
Uncaffeinated needs Lisp in their life. The programming language doesn’t have a feature you need? Implement it yourself 👍
The comment itself:
[…] Rust-coreutils does affect us. This is something we definitely see as part of the base so even though we would prefer for coreutils not to change, we’re hoping to align with Ubuntu on this. We’re concerned with regressions. New code almost always introduces regressions. That’s a lot of new code on very important components. I was shocked to see rust-coreutils updated from 0.7 to 0.8 just days before the stable release of Ubuntu 26.04. It actually broke something important on our side. We fixed it. I’m sure Ubuntu will update it whenever new regressions are found. We’ll see.
Very well written. The comparison makes a lot of sense.
You mean:
apple =
dh/dx - dh/dy =
2xy f’(x²y) - x² f’(x²y) =
2*2*2 *2 - 2*2 *2 =
16 - 8 = 8
Your message’s formatting was a little weird (writing *italic* in Markdown makes the word “italic” show up in italic and makes the asterisks disappear; Lemmy uses Makdown for styling messages)
P.S.: great job with the math btw
Really cool either way!
The box art looks so good…
Now I’m curious, in what kind of computer are you running this on?
Not if the little fucker escapes (with all due respect to the bugs)
What does CGDCT mean?
My main gripe is the lack of professional typesetting software. Scribus just doesn’t cut it.
LaTeX /s/s/s
I unfortunately didn’t understand this post. What edits are being made to this picture?
I never heard about hypersexuality, so I’ve searched the web and found this Wikipedia article about it. From what I found, it seems to be a condition where sexual arousal happening more often than usual. Extra feedback on what hypersexuality is much appreciated.
I think the picture itself is the translation
Woah! That’s really cool!